|
|
Home / Our People
David Aaronberg QC
1981 (QC 2010)
David prosecutes and defends in all areas of criminal law. Prior to taking Silk, David was on the ‘A' panel on the Attorney-General's list of Counsel approved to prosecute criminal cases of great weight, complexity and public importance. He was commended in The Legal 500 (2009) as a leading junior in fraud cases and, as a QC, continues to be instructed in complex cases by, for example, the Serious Fraud Office. David also has considerable experience of regulatory work, particularly on behalf of pharmacists and companies offering pharmaceutical services, as well as Health & Safety prosecutions. He sits as a Recorder. He has taught advocacy and professional ethics for Inner Temple for many years and, as a 'Teacher Trainer', is not only responsible for teaching pupils and new practitioners advocacy skills but also training others to teach them. - Ranked as a Legal Expert in Crime by Legal Experts - Legal 500, www.legalexpertsdirectory.com
- Listed under Criminal Fraud New Silks by the Legal 500, www.legal500.com. Read more here.
Recent Cases- Operation Scarp Prosecution of six defendants for £3 million conspiracy to defraud insurance companies by making false claims
Southwark Crown Court, 2009-11 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2051057/Crash-cash-gang-staged-car-accidents-insurance-companies-3million-jailed.html - R v G Defending in a VAT ‘Carousel' fraud, involving an alleged loss of £120 million
Kingston Crown Court, 2010-11 - R v W Defending the head of a family firm charged with numerous trading standards offences
Leeds Crown Court, 2010 - Operation Sunbird Leading in three cases prosecuting a total of 16 defendants on charges of conspiracy to defraud NatWest of £20 million; money laundering and forgery Southwark Crown Court, 2007-10
- Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v K Representing the Superintendent Pharmacist of a company in relation to alleged professional misconduct, following the death of a patient
Royal Pharmaceutical Society Disciplinary Committee, October 2009
Forthcoming Cases
- R v S, S & P SFO prosecution of the perpetrators of a €20 million bank fraud
Southwark Crown Court, November 2011 - Defending a pharmacist accused of professional misconduct before the General Pharmaceutical Council, December 2011
- Republic of Trinidad & Tobago v Panday Defending the former Prime Minister of the Republic in proceedings alleging breaches of the Integrity in Public Life Act
Port of Spain, Trinidad (Part-heard, resuming December 2011) http://www.newsday.co.tt/crime_and_court/0,142219.html http://www.newsday.co.tt/crime_and_court/0,142456.html - Operation Daybreak Prosecuting a £40 million ‘Ponzi' investment fraud
Southwark Crown Court, January 2012 - Operation Saisir Prosecuting a £6 million "Cash for Crash" insurance fraud
Croydon Crown Court, June 2012 - R v Di Stefano Prosecuting a high-profile figure - "the Devil's Advocate" - for deception offences
Southwark Crown Court, January 2013
News
Articles
- All hail the Bribery Act - the toothless wonder!
Having previously examined in detail the clauses of the Bribery Act 2010, David Aaronberg QC and Nichola Higgins turn their attention to The Bribery Act 2010 Guidance which is intended to assist companies and come to some interesting conclusions. 2011 - The Bribery Act 2010: All Bark and No Bite?
David Aaronberg QC and Nichola Higgins combine their expertise in fraud and corruption to analyse the Bribery Act 2010, particularly the definition of 'adequate procedures' and the regulatory impact on businesses and their compliance procedures. 2010 - Acquitting Co-Conspirators - How 'Blowing Hot And Cold' May Lead To Abuse
R v Gibbins, a first instance ruling by Mr. Justice Field on 21st July 2004 at Southwark Crown Court, brings an extraordinary saga to an abrupt end. David Aaronberg discusses why the judgment is extremely helpful in establishing a number of novel and important points of law, and clarifying an area of confusion. 2004 - Undercover Policing and the Human Rights Act
Undercover police operations, which are becoming more and more part of normal policing procedures conflict with the European Convention on Human Rights. David Aaronberg discusses entrapment in such cases, their effect on criminal proceedings and how the defence should react when evidence is gathered in this way. 2003
|